Search
Calendar

Daily Knight Feeds (RSS)
Advertisements

Fans
Advertisement

 



Monday
08Feb2010

John Murtha 1932 - 2010

 

Rep. John Murtha of Pennsylvania died today due to complications from gall bladder surgery.  He was a Vietnam War veteran, served 18 terms in the U.S. House of Representatives, and recently was an outspoken critic of the Iraq War.  It is hard to describe the noble and honorable service Rep. Murtha has put forth for our country, but his official Congressional website has put it best.

Vintage Murtha

We will miss him fighting and standing up for us all.

Saturday
06Feb2010

Racism in Italian Football

 Mario Balotelli

 

 

 

Mario Balotelli is an Italian footballer of Ghanaian descent that has suffered many abuses from Italian fans because of his race. 

This week the Italian football club Nuovo Casteltodino abandoned a match after two of their Italian players of African descent received repeated abuses.

 

Every weekend I watch football.  I watch football from England, Spain, Italy, Germany and France.  I watch a lot of football, yet watching a match on television does not compare to being in the stadium.  The atmosphere inside a football stadium is hard to duplicate and many sports pale in comparison.  Seeing a football match live is truly something everyone should witness even if you are not a fan of the sport.  It is an environment that should be experienced and not just viewed from afar, yet there are aspects that need to be removed.

During my times in Europe I’ve attended a handful of matches, and I enjoyed them all, but I do remember a few occasions where there were chants that I did not appreciate or sections of the stadium that I was advised not to purchase tickets in, and all of this was solely due to the color of my skin.

In modern day society, and past societies, racism and/or prejudices towards other groups are nearly inevitable.  People may be unfamiliar with a group of people and their initial judgments towards the character of those individuals could be based on appearance and/or habits.  At some point people must find a way of dealing with these differences.  Some may respond negatively, some positively, and others completely indifferent, but the main theme should be that although the end result may be similar the process of getting their was most likely completely different.

In Italy people may be inclined to racist actions not because of an overwhelming belief that people of African descent are beneath them, but instead because their country is in a very vulnerable geographic location that makes them ripe for invasion and therefore the people are wary of individuals that one could deem as foreign.  Italian racism could arise from opinions that originate from the slave trade during the Roman Empire.  The method for addressing this problem could reside in their Roman Catholic faith, as the audio clip alluded to.  This perspective does not make their racism any less significant to that which exists in the United States, which originated solely from the slave trade, but it may gave a better method for which we can address and hopefully solve the problem.

Racism may be an international problem, but addressing it domestically may be the ideal method for solving this issue.

 

For more info on this topic go to the BBC.

Friday
05Feb2010

The Black Steve McQueen

Steve McQueen

Steve McQueen may have been an actor from a previous generation, and he may no longer be the definition of cool, but that should in no way ignore the fact that he was and still is cool.  From The Thomas Crown Affair to The Great Escape he made a lasting impression on American cinema, but sometimes actors are lucky enough to be more than actors.  People do not what to be their characters, but instead want to emulate the person.  Steve McQueen had this quality.

I remember wanting to be the Black Steve McQueen because I thought that would be cool, yet strangely that title has officially been taken.  Considering the President’s high level of coolness from attending college basketball games courtside and being photographed by Terry Richardson in addition to being the first Black President, one would think that he may be the new definition of cool, but he cannot be the Black Steve McQueen.  (Being President should be better than being cool.)  Jay-Z can also not be the Black Steve McQueen.  The new Black Steve McQueen is actually Steve McQueen and he is very cool.

He is a British film director and artist and he is quite good at both.  His latest film Hunger, which will be released by the Criterion Collection on February 16th, depicts Bobby Sands’ hunger strike while in Northern Ireland’s Maze prison.  Sands went on strike because his fellow IRA members, himself included, were not being treated as political prisoners.  Additionally, he also has two exhibits on display at the Marian Goodman Gallery in New York through March 6th.   His current project Queen and Country is a series of commemorative stamps for the British Postal Service that depict each of the British soldiers that were killed in the War in Iraq.  He has also won the coveted Turner Prize and the Camera d’Or at the Cannes Film Festival for Hunger.

Steve McQueen may no longer be a movie star, but he is still pretty cool.

Steve McQueen

I don't walk around with a label saying: "Oh, I'm an artist." I don't have a studio, and I don't know many artists. I just do what I do.

              Steve McQueen

That's cool.

Thursday
04Feb2010

Septuagenarians May Ruin America

John Oliver was not referring to these septuagenarians

The Daily Show’s John Oliver gave a very compelling argument concerning the absurdity of certain elderly Senator’s disapproval of overturning “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” in our military.  Despite the desire of the President, high ranking military officials, and the majority of the American public these elderly Senators refuse to reconsider their stance.  If these Senators can stand in the way of the will of the American public on this issue, equal rights for all Americans, based on archaic notions of right and wrong, then they will be more inclined to impede Americans on a wide array of other issues ranging from health care, economic policy, civil liberties, and more.  America may have a new threat that is equally absurd as it is dangerous.

Watch the video below.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
A Few Gay Men & Women
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Health Care Crisis
Thursday
04Feb2010

A Great Place to Live

Earlier this week a Moroccan man was denied French citizenship for forcing his wife to wear a niqab, a full veil that only allows for her eyes to be seen, due to his behavior being ‘incompatible with French values’.  (The Guardian has the full story.) French Imigration Minister Eric Besson said,

"It emerged during the inquiry and the interview process that this person forced his wife to wear the full veil, deprived her of freedom of movement with her face exposed and rejected the principles of secularism and equality between men and women,"

This outward and distorted display of Islamic principles not only went against the ideals of France’s secular government, but also its basic principle of equality among the sexes.  A man should not be able to so strictly regulate the attire and life of his wife and then be allowed citizenship in a country that opposes these practices.  To make matters even worse he justified these actions by citing his religious beliefs.  France has had a long tradition of secular values that have existed since the French Revolution, and religious expression in government buildings have long been outlawed.  Public schools, courthouses or any government buildings do not display the Ten Commandments, the crucifix, the Star of David, the Koran or any religious imagery.  The French Republic is separate from the church and therefore cannot support any religion.  By not supporting any religion, the French Republic cannot accept justification for actions based solely on religious beliefs.  Actions must be vindicated by reason and logic, and not merely religious dogma.  This is a level of governing that many countries have failed to attain; yet all should aspire for. 

It seems strange to support an individual not obtaining citizenship due to his religious beliefs, but in this situation it is appropriate.  Governments should work towards sustaining and furthering the equality and freedoms of its people, and when an individual acts to diminish this equality and these freedoms he should not be granted the luxury of participating regardless of his justifications.  In the end, we should all hope that this man eventually starts to treat his wife as an equal, and allow her to have all the freedoms that a French person enjoys.  Until, that day happens he truly is not French, and should not be treated as a Frenchmen.

 

In a completely unrelated story France was voted the best country to live in for the fifth time in a row by International Living’s annual Quality of Life Index.  In evalutating France International Living stated,

"No surprise. Its tiresome bureaucracy and high taxes are outweighed by an unsurpassable quality of life, including the world's best health care."



Wednesday
03Feb2010

Professor Obama teaches the Democrats

 

This Q & A with the Democrats may not be as revolutionary or surprising as the one the President had last Friday, but for the case of fairness and the stability of our democracy it is absolutely necessary.  The public needs to see the President express his opinions to all parties, so that the public can know where the President stands on all issues and towards all people.  The public needs to know the President's agenda, and meetings like this allow for all of us to have a greater understanding of our government and its intentions.

Below is a quote from the President that I particularly enjoyed (However I would recommend for you to continue reading this blog.  He was referring to congressmen and not the general public.).

 

You know what I think would actually make a difference, Michael -- I think if everybody here -- excuse all the members of the press who are here -- if everybody here turned off your CNN, your Fox, your -- just turn off the TV -- MSNBC, blogs -- and just go talk to folks out there, instead of being in this echo chamber where the topic is constantly politics -- the topic is politics. It is much more difficult to get a conversation focused on how are we going to help people than a conversation about how is this going to help or hurt somebody politically.

 

And that's part of what the American people are just sick of -- because they don't care, frankly, about majority and minorities and process and this and that. They just want to know, are you delivering for me? And we've got to, I think, get out of the echo chamber. That was a mistake that I think I made last year, was just not getting out of here enough. And it's helpful when you do.

 

Around the 37:00 mark he also gives Sen. Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas a strong response to her question that implies that the Administration does not understand the plight of the every day working American.  Additionally, the President also answers questions concerning foreign trade, clean energy, and government efficiency throughout the entire Q & A.  Enjoy.

To get the transcripts of the Q & A visit the Huffington Post.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

 

 

Wednesday
03Feb2010

Passion Pit - "Sleepyhead" 

Passion Pit-Sleepyhead from ssarenofun1 on Vimeo.

 

 

A great video by a great group.

Saturday
30Jan2010

Professor Obama teaches the GOP

Teaching is fun.

Yesterday President Obama attended a House Republican retreat and agreed to have Q & A.  The White House negotiated with the GOP and agreed to have the entire Q & A and the speech that preceded it film live on national television.  The President walked into the Republican's lion den and emerged victorious as Sam Stein of The Huffington Post put it.  The Republican leaders questioned the President's policies ranging from the stimulus package, health care, defense, the budget, and a wide range of other concerns.  The President answered all of their questions in a manner that not only educated the viewers at home, but also the Republican Party.  This truly was an event that I have never seen in modern day American politics, and everyone who is concerned or interested in the workings of their government should watch the video of this event.

 

Watch the video below.

 

Friday
29Jan2010

Ignorance and Hindsight are Essential for Judgment 

Two statements could sum up today’s Iraq Inquiry cross-examination of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair:  Ignorance is bliss and hindsight is 20/20. 

When the former Prime Minister was pressed about the links between terrorism and Saddam Hussein’s supposed WMD’s, and if they posed a threat to the UK he replied with, “Yes, because for the reasons that I have given, if Saddam, freed from sanctions, was able to pursue WMD programs, I was very sure that at some point we were going to be involved in the consequences of that.”

This is good logic except that he in that logic gives an example of how the UK could minimize this threat.  Why would you decide to remove sanctions from Saddam Hussein that could allow him to pursue WMD programs?

However, we could review the logic of his decisions for days, but more importantly we should review his competency.  When he was asked, "You weren't aware yourself that you were overstating the intelligence?" he replied with, “Correct”.  The former Prime Minister of the UK basically stated that he had no idea what he was doing, and therefore since he did not know the difference between up and down he could not have lied.  Lying would consist of knowing that down was down, and then telling everyone that it was up.  Tony Blair however thought down was up, and told everyone that down was up.  That is not a lie, but instead just deadly ignorance and that should be regarded as a nearly equal crime.

Additionally, Mr. Blair also admitted that the threat posed by Saddam Hussein has been overstated, and that the threat did not increase after 9/11.  This is a conclusion he has now come to, but is not what he felt while he was Prime Minister.  Hindsight is 20/20.

The problem with these excuses is that they basically allow anyone to get away with anything.  Ignorance cannot be an excusable reason for committing crimes, and eventual education cannot be an excuse for not having to face punishment.  The public should be able to determine what a person should be able to know and that should justify the punishment.  The fact that Mr. Blair knows the error of his ways now, once he is in a position of less influence would imply that he should have known more while he was Prime Minister.

Tony Blair’s logic would be the same as driving your car at 110 mph and then protesting that you should not get a ticket because you were unaware of the speed limit since you were driving so fast that you could not see the signs, yet you currently realize that corrects could have been made and therefore will not do it again.  When nearly all of Britain protests your actions, and you have no explanation that proves the wisdom of your acts, then you have obviously done something wrong.  You may have been ignorant and you may know that now, but that should never be an excuse or justification for your actions.

 

You can read more about the Iraq Inquiry at the Times of London.

Friday
29Jan2010

The Iraq Inquiry

Today former British Prime Minister Tony Blair will face a grueling six-hour cross-examination about the legality of sending British soldiers to fight and die in Iraq.  The British want to know when he decided to commit British soldiers to America’s folly.  They want to know if the reasons that Tony Blair delivered to the British public to explain his commitment to America’s cause were shrouded in lies.  For a country that never supported the war and a Labour Party that publicly expressed its disagreements with the Prime Minister, they both feel they need an explanation for Tony Blair’s acts.  The only person that should be able to give that answer is Tony Blair. 

I wish Americans had the gumption to hold their public officials accountable to a comparable level to the British.  Today, we still have people that will argue the on the behalf of the former President and proclaim the benefits and necessity of invading Iraq.  People still bemoan the moments when liberals acknowledge that many of our present problems originated with the previous administration.  We need to become accustomed to holding people accountable for their actions, especially when those actions may have consisted of illegal acts and lies.

 

Tony Blair thus far has already acknowledged that he would have committed British soldiers to a war in Iraq regardless of whether Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction or not.  Also he has argued that his “assessment” of Saddam Hussein changed after the attacks of 9/11.  Before Saddam Hussein was a defiant Middle Eastern leader that needed to be monitored.  In the post-9/11 world we could not longer take the risk of simply monitoring him, but instead needed to remove him.  That logic would have made sense if Saddam Hussein had any relationship with the attacks on 9/11, but he did not.  This logic would be the equivalent of al-Qaeda attacking Canada due to its association with the United States. 

Tony Blair will probably have a very rough six-hours, and this is warranted.  I will provide an update on the Inquiry once it has been completed.

Thursday
28Jan2010

The State of our Humor

This State of the Union Address focused on the seriousness of our times and the needed fight for improvement, but did so in a manner that facilitated cooperation

Yesterday President Obama gave one of the best State of the Union speeches I have heard in quite a while.  Was his speech great because of his known oratory brilliance?  Did he use the same cadences that bred success during the campaign trail?  The answer to both of these questions has to be no, yet the speech was still brilliant.  The greatness of this speech was due to the fact that the campaigning has stopped.  The act of attempting to sell the supposed greatness of the man is over, and the reality of having to deal with reality has truly begun.  The euphoria surrounding his victory has gone away, and we should all be happy with that.  Now something has to take the place of that euphoria, and over the past year we have had many candidates.  Fear has always faced a constant battle with anger and indifference for the minds of Americans when we become faced with the seriousness of our plight, and during previous State of the Unions these negative emotions have been evoked to further selfish motives, yet this one was different.  President Obama instead decided to address the serious issues of our time, but instead decided to enlist humor to accompany the American public while we embark on this arduous journey.

During yesterdays address the President decided to make light of the fact that Republicans opted to not applaud with the Democrats when he mentioned the tax breaks that his administration has enacted.  President Obama poked fun at his wife by claiming that “she gets embarrassed” when receiving applause.  The President made light of the fact that the Republican Party may not enjoy the monthly meetings that he plans to hold with both Democrats and Republicans.  However, his speech was not just fun and games.  He reviewed the Stimulus Package, outlined a new jobs bill and even said he would pass the jobs bill through executive order if it did not pass the Senate.  He mentioned the error in the Supreme Court’s decision to make money more valuable that people.  He discussed the fees that those companies who were saved by the bailout must now pay to repay the American people.  He spoke about the revitalization of the American economy through clean energy and the large strides he has made with Russia to reduce both countries nuclear stock piles and fight nuclear proliferation.  He chastised Iran and promised that all U.S. troops will be out of Iraq by the end of the year.  He stated his stance that gay Americans should be able to openly serve in the military.  The President also spoke about the divisions that sully our political system that allow lobbyists to have an unwanted or unneeded influence and impair basic discussions between parties.  Additionally, he also admitted that he could not complete these changes alone.   The President made light of his own presidential campaign by explaining that “Change you can believe in” was never supposed to be easy.  It was never supposed to be something that did not require the support of millions of people.  The democracy of a country of 300 million people is supposed to be hard and messy, and we need to see this or change will never be able to occur.  It is funny that people may have seen these realities from a different angle, but it is only funny because laughing is far more productive than crying.

Yesterday, around 6pm a full three hours before the State of the Union I had a great discussion with a friend of mine about the importance of humor.  He is of the opinion that I should be a comedian, and I find that laughable.  He does not see the humor in my opinion, so a discussion started.  He felt that politics could be served at a later date, and that I could focus on comedy now because I am so funny.  Eventually, my success could help my additional aspirations.  That was his argument, and it makes sense, but that does not make it correct.  Humor is something that you can apply to all aspects of life, yet is needed most during the most serious of times.  When I look back at eight years of State of the Union Addresses being delivered by George W. Bush I should cry.  I should feel the pain of those who grew up in the lost decade to only see their President welcome them with fear and absurdity, yet what would that do.  Fear is crippling and crying is debilitating, and what good will those do for anyone.  We all should be able to look at the predicament that we are in and the absurdity that surrounds us and be able to laugh while we work hard to fix it.  St. Augustine once said, “Hope has two sons:  Anger and Courage.  Anger at the way things are and Courage to make them better.”  As Americans we have been overcome with anger and fear for far too long and the President yesterday marked the need for that to change through the necessity for us all to have the courage to confront our issues while being able to laugh along the way.  Humor is always a great companion for good judgment.  This President looks to be one that you can laugh with, and that should be much more beneficial than a President that you can have a beer with.

 

Below is the full video of President Barack Obama’s State of the Union Address, and you will be surprised how quickly the 70 minutes flows by due to the ability to laugh along the way.



Wednesday
27Jan2010

A new 'Nixon' and a new 'Watergate'

The emergence of a new 'Nixon' and the evidence of a new 'Watergate' actually have nothing to do with each other, but coincidentally they have arisen around the same time.  The new ‘Nixon’ is not much of a development.  Simply Richard Nixon’s grandson Chris Cox has decided to run for Congress from New York.  In addition to being Richard Nixon’s grandson, Chris Cox’s father is the current chairman of the New York State GOP and Chris Cox was the Executive Director of the New York arm of John McCain’s 2008 presidential campaign.  Chris Cox appears to be a very well connected Republican and all we can hope is that he does not apply the Richard Nixon maxim of “If the President does it, then it is not illegal.”  Presidents are not above the law, and anyone related to Richard Nixon should be firmly aware of this fact.  However, the new ‘Watergate’ of our time is something that none of us should ignore.

Click to read more ...

Tuesday
26Jan2010

I hate taking out the trash

14-year-old John Caudle

Our mutual dislike for taking out the trash is the sole similarity between John Caudle and me.  When I don't want to take out the trash I usually find a way to kill time for about fifteen to twenty minutes, and then I take out the trash.  (Despite how annoying taking out the trash may be, an apartment or house that is infested with bugs due to an accumulation of trash is even worse.)  When 14-year-old John Caudle does not want to take out the trash he kills his parents.

To be exact, John Caudle refuses to take out the trash, gets into an argument with his mother, and then finds the gun in the house and kills her.  He then hides in a closet for his stepfather to come home, and he then shoots him.  After killing his mom and stepfather he plays some video games, and then goes to bed.  The following morning he takes his stepfather's car and drives it to school.  He attends school with a smile on his face and appears in a great mood.  Once school is over he takes the car and flees before being caught 130 miles away from his home.

This is one of those crimes that is hard to comprehend and makes you wonder how it could occur.  People wonder about the home life or the mental disposition of the child, but at some point we have to question the sanity of keeping guns in your home.  This crime was made possible by guns.  An irate child is expected, yet an irate child with a gun is a potential murderer.  When cases like this occur I wish people would discuss how carrying guns in the home actually makes people less safe instead of focusing solely on the tragedy of the incident.

Watch the video below.

Tuesday
26Jan2010

"Too Dumb to Thrive"

Joe Klein had this nice article concerning the Stimulus Package, and how American's are so angry about it because they know absolutely nothing about it.  American's are spending too much time being angry that they cannot even see when someone is helping them.

To quote Joe Klein,

It is very difficult to have a democracy without citizens. It is impossible to be a citizen if you don't make an effort to understand the most basic activities of your government. It is very difficult to thrive in an increasingly competitive world if you're a nation of dodos.

 

In a nation that has so much, it remains amazing how people can still know so little.  This ignorance does a disservice to everyone.

 

You can read his article HERE.

Tuesday
26Jan2010

Money is more important than people

This is a fact.  The Supreme Court made it so last Thursday.  Yes I know it is Tuesday, so to many this may be old news now, but I still feel that it is worth discussing.  When you wake up in the morning and the money that you have in your pocket or in your bank account has a greater value than yourself, I think it only appropriate to take the weekend and address the major changes that have occurred in your life.

I woke up Thursday morning and I was a regular person.  I tried to be respectful to everyone I met.  If someone were in need I would try to help them.  They could live down the street or in a foreign country.  Proximity mattered not, but instead a realist view that valued life proved to be the overriding influence.  I would do countless things throughout they day because I enjoyed them, or felt that someone else would enjoy the effort, and numerous times these efforts never made me any money.  Plenty of times they cost me money, yet I always felt that they had a positive value.  Money was leaving my pocket, yet a feeling of loss never occurred.  The Supreme Court does not see life in this manner.

In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Federal Election Commission, and that should say enough.  In the Court’s judgment they voted to allow corporations the ability to contribute or invest an unlimited amount of funds into political campaigns:  the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling in Citizens United v. FEC centered on the argument that corporations should be regarded as equal to people, and therefore we should not infringe upon their First Amendment rights.  Despite the fact that corporations merely exist on paper and are incapable of speaking unless that document is being read aloud by a person; the Supreme Court feels that it would be illegal to impede its freedom of speech.  The precedent for this argument originates in Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad and in this case the precedent was set that that corporations should be regarded as people with concerns to taxation.  This may have opened the door for the courts to regard the people as one in the same as corporations, but it should be plain for all to see that the people are more than just entities that require taxation.  When this is not evident to all then I’m afraid that you have “confused metaphor with reality” as former Chief Justice William Rehnquist would say.

Thus as I wake up this morning I must now confront the fact that in the United States of America the metaphor is being confused with reality, and that this confusion is showing no sign of abating.  Entities that only exist because humans allow them to, and could not survive on their own without human influence are now regarded as equal to humans.  The money that I invest in my company can now speak louder than the person who created the company.  The absurdity of all of this should be evident for all to see, and now we must work to ensure that the metaphor does not supplant reality.  The reality values the quality of life, and the metaphor values the quantity of money.